?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Google's OpenSocial is more widget spin than real, usable cross-social network API.

I rip it a new one over at IT Pro:
I've been looking at Google's OpenSocial, and to be honest, I'm not particularly impressed. There is a need for a way of bringing the spiralling maelstrom of social networks into some coherent, cohesive whole. I can see how easy it is for people staring at the headlights of the oncoming Facebook juggernaut to want to seize hold of the first possible escape route - it's just a pity that OpenSocial came along first.

Yes, OpenSocial can be used to extract information from different web sites and bring them together, but it's missing many of the features that would make it truly compelling.

Firstly, and critically, there's no identity component to OpenSocial. All it is is a set of simple API calls that extract all the information that's available. There's no way for a data provider to control just who sees what and how,it's an all or nothing system. The simplistic model that OpenSocial currently offers means there's no way for me to set a set of rules that expose information in different ways for different people, which is something that's critical when sharing information across sites - which is something that I see as vitally important, and I'm someone living what can best be described as a "radically transparent" online life.
Read more at IT Pro.

Comments

andrewducker
Nov. 2nd, 2007 11:08 pm (UTC)
I'm actually happy with the general definition of "friend" being very loose. Anything tighter would end up working on a smaller subset of sites. If you want it defined more closely then you can set up filters that define friend to you, in the context in which it's being asked. I have about 8 LJ filters for exactly that reason - but I'd use quite different filters for sharing photos, and different ones again for other purposes.