Simon Bisson (sbisson) wrote,
Simon Bisson
sbisson

  • Mood:
  • Music:

Do the sums right and you don't need a kludge...

...and it looks like there's now no need for dark matter to account for galactic rotation curves - if you use General Relativity rather than Newtonian gravity.

As the CERN Courier puts it:
This is because even for weak fields and slow speeds, well-known non-linearities change the character of the solution dramatically. The success of Newtonian mechanics in situations like our solar system can be traced to the fact that in this case the planets are basically "test particles", which do not contribute significantly to the overall field. However, in a galaxy this approximation is not a good one - all the rotating matter is also the source of the gravitational field in which everything rotates.
You'll find a full text copy of the paper in question here.
A galaxy is modelled as a stationary axially symmetric pressure-free fluid in general relativity. For the weak gravitational fields under consideration, the field equations and the equations of motion ultimately lead to one linear and one non-linear equation relating the angular velocity to the fluid density. It is shown that the rotation curves for the Milky Way, NGC 3031, NGC 3198 and NGC 7331 are consistent with the mass density distributions of the visible matter concentrated in flattened disks. Thus the need for a massive halo of exotic dark matter is removed. For these galaxies we determine the mass density for the luminous threshold as 10^{-21.75} kg.m$^{-3}.
Interesting stuff, and useful for anyone writing space opera...

Original pointer via Slashdot
Tags: dark matter
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 1 comment